homeppsg.gif (2151 bytes)
Link to PPSG
Bibliography

Opioid Availability: Diagnosis and Treatment of Regulatory Barriers

Prepared for: International Conference 1997
Comprehensive Cancer Care
"Focus on Cancer Pain"
Limassol, Cyprus
May 28 - May 31, 1997

Prepared by:
Pain & Policy Studies Group
World Health Organization Collaborating Center
for Policy and Communications in Cancer Care
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin USA

Your comments are welcome.

CITATION: This monograph is not copyrighted and may be quoted or reproduced using the following citation:

Joranson DE, Gilson AM. Opioid availability: Diagnosis and treatment of regulatory barriers. University of Wisconsin Pain & Policy Studies Group/WHO Collaborating Center for Policy and Communications in Cancer Care: Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1997 (Monograph)



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Purpose and introduction
Primary resources
Additional References
Selected Opioid Consumption Trends

CHARTS:

Consumption of morphine and pethidine in the world
Regional consumption of morphine and pethidine in the world
Consumption of morphine and pethidine in individual countries

I. Purpose and introduction

The purpose of this monograph is to provide informational resources that are directly relevant to Europe to improve the availability of opioid analgesics for pain and palliative care. The monograph includes references to key articles and reports. It has been prepared especially for participants of the International Conference on Comprehensive Cancer Care, Cyprus, 28-31 May, 1997. The monograph was prepared by the Pain & Policy Studies Group/WHO Collaborating Center for Policy and Communication in Cancer Care in Madison, Wisconsin, USA, in accordance with its WHO terms of reference which include evaluation of barriers to cancer pain management and monitoring of opioid analgesic consumption worldwide. Comments and suggestions are invited; please send them to David E. Joranson, Pain & Policy Studies Group/WHO Collaborating Center, 1900 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA; fax 1-608-263-0259.

There are several publications of international relevance with which participants should be familiar. These are publications of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), and are listed in this section and in Section II, below. There are also several publications which address regional opioid availability issues in Europe and in Latin America; these are also listed in Section II. Section III contains additional references, including those which are relevant to individual countries. The following publications are of international significance and are briefly summarized because they are particularly important for gaining an understanding about how the international opioid distribution system is intended to work in order to meet the needs of patients who need pain relief.

World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief: With A Guide to Opioid Availability. Geneva: Author, 1996.

The WHO Expert Committee on Cancer Pain Relief and Active Supportive Care has published a second edition of Cancer Pain Relief, with a Guide to Opioid Availability. This Guide explains the system that is used to make morphine and other opioids available for the patients who need these medications for pain. The Guide is for the use of regulators and health care professionals, and is intended to promote communication between them. It briefly reviews the problem of cancer and pain, the necessity of having opioid analgesics available to treat pain, and the WHO strategy for cancer pain relief. The Guide explains how the opioid distribution system should work within the legal framework of international treaty and national narcotic control laws. Particular attention is given to the role of the national estimate of medical need for opioids, and the steps which are necessary to obtain a supply of opioids either by domestic manufacture or by import. Finally, this publication offers guidelines for appropriate regulation of health care professionals who handle opioids, paying special attention to the need to balance concerns about drug abuse with the needs of patients for pain relief.

World Health Organization publications can be obtained from Distribution and Sales, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

International Narcotics Control Board. Availability of Opiates for Medical Needs. New York: United Nations, 1996.

The International Narcotics Control Board is the United Nations body responsible for monitoring governments' compliance with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. The Board recognizes that the regulatory control of narcotics should not interfere with the availability of opioids for medical purposes, including pain management. Further, the Board recognizes its duty to ensure that opioids are sufficiently available to meet medical needs, as defined by individual governments.

In 1995, the INCB surveyed all governments to find out if they have responded to its 1989 recommendations, and to learn what they are doing to identify and address barriers to opioid availability for medical and scientific purposes. Sixty-five governments responded, representing 50% of the worlds population. Only thirty-six of the 65 responding governments (57% of the sample) reported having examined for presence of impediments; of these 36 governments, 32 identified an average of five impediments in each country and four said that no impediments had been found.

Although the WHO has recommended that oral opioids be available for cancer patients in hospitals and in the community, the INCB survey results indicate that the recommended opioids were considerably less available than injectable preparations. Further, less than 50% of the governments reported that morphine, in any dosage form, was stocked in all country s hospitals with cancer programs.

Results of the INCB survey also suggest that legal restrictions are prevalent. Many responding governments indicated that they: (1) require special government-issued forms and other special permissions for the prescription of opioid analgesics, (2) have maximum prison sentences and fines for physicians who fail to comply with prescribing requirements, (3) require physicians to report patients who receive opioid prescriptions, and (4) regulate the maximum dose of opioid analgesics that can be prescribed for outpatients. Moreover, less than half of the governments reported having a national law that reflects the treaty provision from the Single Convention recognizing that narcotic drugs are indispensable for the treatment of pain and suffering.

Another important result of the INCB survey was that a majority of the governments indicated that they have national policies to improve medical use of opioids, as well as anticipate significant further increases in consumption of opioids. Based on these studies, the INCB concluded that a small but significant number of governments are making efforts to improve the availability of opioids for medical use, but that a number of problems remain which governments must address.

NOTE: INCB reports are United Nations publications and may be obtained from bookstores and distributors throughout the world. Consult your bookstore or write to: United Nations, Sales Section, New York or Geneva. (If there is difficulty obtaining a publication, contact the INCB at Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 500, A-1400, Vienna, Austria, Fax 43 1 21345-5867) [This document is published in English, French and Spanish.]

[Back to the Table of Contents]

II. Primary resources

  1. Joranson DE, Colleau SM. Medical need for opioids far from being met. Cancer Pain Relief, 1996;9(Suppl.):1-3.
  2. Colleau SM, Joranson DE. Highlights of the INCB report. Cancer Pain Relief, 1996;9(Suppl.):1-3. Subscriptions to Cancer Pain Release, a newsletter of the WHO, can be obtained by writing to the Pain & Policy Studies Group/WHO Collaborating Center, 1900 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, USA; fax 1 -608-263-0259.
  3. Colleau SM (ed). Making opioids available to treat cancer pain: the international system. Cancer Pain Release, 1994;7(2-3):1-4. [Explanation of how the international narcotic control system works.]
  4. International Narcotics Control Board. Narcotic drugs: estimated world requirements for 1995, statistics for 1993. United Nations; New York, 1995. [This document is published annually and each report is in English, French and Spanish.]
  5. International Narcotics Control Board. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1989: demand for and supply of opiates for medical and scientific needs. New York: United Nations, 1989. [Available in English, French, Spanish versions]
  6. Stjernsward J, Bruera E, Joranson DE, Allende S. et al. Opioid availability in Latin America: the declaration of Florianopolis. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1995;10(3):233-236. [A summary of the findings and recommendations concerning opioid availability in Latin America.]
  7. United Nations. Competent national authorities under the international drug control treaties. United Nations; New York, 1995. [Lists the address of the government agency in each country which is responsible for establishing the national estimate of medical need for opioids; each report is in English, French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, and Arabic.]
  8. Zenz M, Willweber-Strumpf A. Opiophobia and cancer pain in Europe. The Lancet, 1993;341:1075-1076. [An overview of regulatory barriers to opioid availability in Europe.]


[Back to the Table of Contents]

III. Additional references

  1. Angarola RT. National and international regulation of opioid drugs: purpose, structures, benefits and risks. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1990;5(2) (Suppl.):S6-S11.
  2. Bruera E. Palliative care in Latin America. J Pain Symptom Manage 1993(6):365-368.
  3. Caraceni A. Availability and use of opioids for cancer pain patients in Italy. [Letter] J Pain Symptom Manage, 1987;2(3):127-128.
  4. Colleau S, and Bruera E. [eds.] Cancer pain relief in Central and South America: a progress report. Cancer Pain Release, 1993;6(2-3):1-8.
  5. Colleau S. [ed.] Cancer Pain Release. 1995;8(2);19-20. [This issue contains up to date reports on palliative care and use of morphine in Catalonia and Colombia.]
  6. Gomez-Batiste X, Fontanals de Nadal MD, Via JM, Roca J, Trelis J, Porta J, Stjernsward J, Trias X. Catalonia's five-year plan: preliminary results. Eur J Palliat Care, 1994;1:98-101.
  7. Jage J. Opioids and the fear of addiction in Germany. Cancer Pain Release, 1991;5(2): 1,1.
  8. Joranson DE, Gilson AM, Krchnavek K. Opioid analgesics for cancer pain relief: A review of consumption trends and the literature relating to Latin American countries, 1994 (Monograph).
  9. Joranson DE, Gilson AM. Controlled substances, medical practice and the law. In: Schwartz HI. Psychiatric Practice Under Fire: The Influence of Government, the Media and Special Interests on Somatic Therapies. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 1994:173-194. [Barriers to opioid availability in the USA]
  10. Joranson DE. Prescribing for cancer pain (in Netherlands): reflections on progress and directions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Care in Pain & Symptom Control, 1994;2(2): 1-4.
  11. Joranson DE. Availability of opioids for cancer pain: recent trends, assessment of system barriers, new WHO guidelines, and the risk of diversion. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1993;8:353-360. [Contains a survey instrument for assessing barriers to opioid availability.]
  12. Larue F, Colleau SM, Fontaine A, Brasseur L. Oncologists and primary care physicians' attitudes toward pain control and morphine prescribing in France. Cancer, 1995;76(11):2375-2382.
  13. Larue F, Colleau SM, Brasseur L, Cleeland CS. Multicentre study of cancer pain and its treatment in France. British Medical Journal, 1995;310:1034-1037.
  14. Luczak J. Palliative/hospice care in Poland. Palliative Medicine, 1993;7:67-75. [Discusses opioid policy, progress and issues in Poland.]
  15. Stjernsward J, Joranson DE. Opioid availability and cancer pain-an unnecessary tragedy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 1995;3:157-158.
  16. Wenk R. Argentina: status of cancer pain and palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1993;8(6):385-387.
  17. World Health Organization. Cancer pain relief and palliative care (Technical Report Series 804), Geneva: WHO, 1990.
  18. Zenz M, Zenz T, Tribe M, Strumpf M. Severe under treatment of cancer pain: a year survey of the German situation. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1995;10(3):187-191.
  19. Zenz M. Treatment for cancer pain in France. [Letter] British Medical Journal, 1995;311 :387.
  20. Zenz M. Germany: status of cancer pain and palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1993;8(6):416-418.



[Back to the Table of Contents]

Selected opioid consumption trends



The graphs on the following pages describe the consumption of morphine and pethidine in the world, as well as in selected countries. "Consumption" means that amount of drug which has been supplied to physicians, pharmacies and hospitals for retail distribution, i.e., patient care. Consumption also includes drugs supplied for scientific research, although these amounts are typically quite small. Over time, consumption is a good indicator of patient use, except for exceptions which are noted below. These data are furnished by governments to the International Narcotics Control Board in accordance with their obligations as parties to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. The reader should consult the INCB reports for the official statistics. Statistics on each country's estimate of medical need for opioids, the country's status of treaty adherence, and consumption of principal opioids for the last five years are reported in an annual publication of the Board.

The purpose of the consumption graphs is to communicate data on the global, regional and country consumption of selected opioids to health care professionals and regulators so they can see what the trends have been. 1994 data for individual countries was included where available; global and regional data for 1994 was not included since a number of countries have not yet reported to the INCB, making the global totals incomplete. Absence of data for a country's consumption for a particular year means either that a) the government did not report the information, or b) the amount reported was less than 1 kilogram.

Morphine was selected since the WHO recommends use of this analgesic, and because it uses these consumption data as a rough indicator of progress to relieve cancer pain. (It should be noted that the INCB morphine consumption data also includes the amounts of morphine that are converted to non-analgesic drug products. Consequently, the global morphine consumption statistic is inflated by several per cent; this inflation may be much more significant in certain countries for particular years where amounts of morphine for conversion are actually greater than the amount of morphine consumed as an analgesic for patient needs; for example, this has occurred in Italy and Argentina.)

Pethidine is used for comparison purposes because of its wide-spread use as an analgesic. Codeine trends are not reported here since it is used for medical purposes other than analgesia, such as cough and diarrhea. Other important opioid agonists are not reported here, although they are increasingly being used in some countries; these include dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, levorphanol, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone and oxycodone. Also not reported is the use of other less potent and lesser-controlled analgesics such as dextropropoxyphene and pentazocine.

The following pages contain the consumption trends for the world, regions of Europe and individual countries in the European region.

Consumption of morphine and pethidine in the world

Global Consumption of Morphine
Global Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine

[Back to the Table of Contents]

Regional consumption of morphine and pethidine

Consumption of Morphine in Europe
Regional Consumption of Morphine European Region

[Back to the Table of Contents]

Consumption of morphine and pethidine in individual countries

Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Albania
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Austria
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Belgium
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Bulgaria
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Croatia
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: The Czech Republic
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Denmark
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Estonia
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Finland
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: France
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Germany
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Greece
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Hungary
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Iceland
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Ireland
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Italy
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Luxembourg
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Malta
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Netherlands
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Norway
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Poland
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Portugal
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: romania
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: The Russian Federation
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Spain
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Sweden
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Switzerland
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: Turkey
Consumption of Morphine and Pethidine: United Kingdom

[Back to the Table of Contents]